Menu

Search

Styles Packs

Links

« Prev | Browsing Chatbox | Next »
1 ... 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 ... 696

auto
2004-01-22 21:44
I put windows on one of my box's, now its waiting for a new xoblite release ;]

snkmchnb
2004-01-22 16:13
qwilk: but what about the coffee maker?

qwilk
2004-01-22 11:09
Again, the magic word here is *multi*amp. Although it might be possible to add song titles, playlist etc for one of the players, the main idea behind multiamp was/is that it should support *multiple* media players. And that's when things get ugly, when you have to start adding different implementations of above mentioned functionality for each player. But if you put them into a separate plugin, you could make one for foobar2000, if that's easy to do, etc.

Pitkon
2004-01-22 09:41
freeb0rn: How do u like ur espresso? I hear the next release of multiamp will include a coffee maker... :)

sMs
2004-01-22 08:56
well forget playlist, but what about display song titles? isit hard? and about playlist maybe just make ppl use foobar with his blackbox to be able to use playlist

freeb0rn
2004-01-22 08:21
i really want multiamp to be able to dsiplay song titles. i don't see how that is any different beyond its current 'function' really, beyond that it displays some info. i don't want it as a playlist tho. It could be added as a line under or next to or above the controls, and styled etc. It'd be even COOLER if there was an option that on MouseOut it would show the song title and on MouseOVer it would show the player controls. I know it was once impossible to grab the songname etc from foobar but alot has changed and i think i read something about how it got implemented closely to how winamp does it... sooo... pweeeez!

Pitkon
2004-01-22 03:31
I think the only thing missing from multiamp is the ability to fit in the slit...

NC-17
2004-01-22 02:50
i guess if the fb2k guys changed their implementation, you would have to as well qwilk :)

qwilk
2004-01-22 01:47
Please note that multiamp was/is intended to be a controller for different media players. Adding e.g. playlists would require entirely different implementations for each player, making the plugin into a bloated monster. Bottom line, (and as I have said all along) such functionality belongs in a separate plugin. When there is nothing to gain by integrating the two, it is better to maintain the modular approach of the shell.

multifate
2004-01-21 21:49
i dont seem to have that problem sMs


© 2003-2006, Brian "Tres`ni" Hartvigsen, Jesterace, snkmchnb and NC-17
Styles © of their respective authors
Please direct all administrative questions/comments to Jesterace, snkmchnb or NC-17
Random Screenshot

Style Switcher

Chatbox